Search for: All records

Abstract Biocrusts are a critical surface cover in global drylands, but knowledge about their influences on surface soil thermal properties are still lacking because it is quite challenging to make accurate thermal property measurements for biocrust layers, which are only millimetres thick. In this study, we repacked biocrust layers (moss‐ and cyanobacteria‐dominated, respectively) that had the same material as the original intact biocrusts but was more homogeneous and thicker. The thermal conductivity (λ), heat capacity (C) and thermal diffusivity (k) of the repacked and intact biocrusts were measured by the heat pulse (HP) technique at different mass water contents (θ_m) and mass ratios (W_t), and the differences between repacked and intact biocrusts were analysed. Our results show that biocrusts substantially alter the thermal properties of the soil surface. The averageλof moss (0.37 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹) and cyanobacteria biocrusts (0.90 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹) were reduced by 63.0% and 10.3% compared with bare soil (1.00 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹), respectively. Edge effects including heat loss and water evaporation caused theλandkof the biocrusts to be underestimated, but theCto be overestimated. The differences in thermal properties were significant (p <0.001), except for the differences in thermal conductivity between repacked and intact cyanobacteria biocrusts, which were not significant (p = 0.379). Specifically, in the volumetric water content (θ_v) range of 0 to 20%, theλandkof the repacked moss biocrusts were underestimated by 59.1% and 61.8%, respectively, and theCwas overestimated by 23.9% compared with the intact moss biocrusts. Theλandkof the repacked cyanobacteria biocrusts were underestimated by 15.8% and 79.2%, respectively, and theCwas overestimated by 34.8% compared with the intact cyanobacteria biocrusts at theθ_vrange of 0 to 30%. Typically, this difference increased as theθ_vrises between repacked and intact biocrusts. Our new measurements provide evidence that the thermal properties of biocrusts were previously misjudged due to the measurement limitations imposed by their limited thickness when measured in situ. Biocrusts are likely more significant in regulating soil heat and temperature in drylands than was previously assumed.